At TSIA, we receive a steady stream of inquiries from our members, which give us insight into the most pressing business challenges technology companies are facing across the industry. We then translate these challenges into a list of capabilities organizations will need to embrace in order to succeed in the coming years. One of these key capabilities is something that has become so prevalent across the industry that we've dedicated an entire blog series to it: organizational alignment and convergence.
Before I get into what organizational convergence means for my area of research expertise, field services, I'd like to first explore what's driving the need for this alignment. The industry-wide shift to “as-a-service” business models, where customers look to purchase technology-as-a-service instead of an asset they own, is still uncharted territory for many tech organizations. This is why at TSIA, we're hard at work developing frameworks, organizational constructs, and benchmark performance metrics to help our members navigate these unfamiliar waters and accelerate their business transformation in an increasingly cloud-based world.
Unfortunately for hardware manufacturers, there's still a disconnect in understanding exactly what these new business models mean for them. After all, there's no way that a turbine, instrumentation, valves, robotics, etc., can be put in the Cloud. Instead, the goal here is to create a “digital twin” of each piece of hardware that resides in the Cloud, where the physical properties of the hardware and data about its performance is collected, stored, and easily monitored without having to go on-site to a customer location. These analytics can then be used to inform future offers that both improve the function of the technology and lead to better customer outcomes.
With this new focus on delivering customer outcomes rather than simply supplying hardware, manufacturers and field services organizations are needing to adjust their processes and adapt to changing customer demands. Under these new business models, the up-front CapEx revenue is replaced by a monthly service fee as customers purchase access to the technology rather than purchasing it outright. The installation, maintenance, and operation of the system falls to the supplier, which is performed by field service technicians.
In as-a-service business models, customers purchase monthly access to technology rather than buy it outright.
Under these outcome-based business models, techs who initially provided reactive “break/fix” support must now adopt a more proactive support role. They also perform adoption services that better facilitate customer outcomes and ensure they receive value from their purchase. However, a number one requirement of them is to be more efficient and keep costs low. So, how can they meet this expectation with added responsibilities added into the mix?
Traditional CapEx models offered support and maintenance contracts as equipment became more complex. The supplier's primary financial focus was to control cost and to get a desired return on that cost. As a result, field services organizations were set up as cost centers and pricing was primarily “cost plus.” Based on TSIA benchmark data, we know that 33% of today's field services organizations still run as a cost center where their main goal is to keep the equipment running while keeping costs low.
Based on TSIA benchmark data, we know that 33% of today's field services organizations still run as a cost center where their main goal is to keep the equipment running while keeping costs low.
As support and maintenance offers become commoditized, the ability to maintain a desirable gross margin is hampered by constant price pressure while increasing customer demands require new capabilities and additional costs. A focus on the value created by these skilled technicians, and assuming responsibility for the top line, has led to 54% of field services organizations now operating as a profit center.
The remaining 13% of organizations have embraced as-a-service offers and are leveraging the field service engineer's status as a trusted advisor to deliver, and get paid for, improved customer outcomes.
These changing offers and unrelenting cost pressures on field services organizations are the catalyst for serious strategic discussions. To effectively make this transition from cost center, to profit center, to as-a-service requires organizational alignment and convergence. Here's a look at what to take into consideration when making this transition:
(Click image to enlarge.)
Source: TSIA State of Field Services 2017.
Source: TSIA State of Field Services 2017.
For even more about how organizational convergence is impacting the industry, be sure to check out other posts in this blog series by other TSIA research experts,
Post Date: April 19, 2017
Vele Galovski is vice president of research, Field Services, for TSIA. Using his nearly 30 years of industry experience, he has consistently helped companies both large and small drive double-digit top-line growth with a proven retain, gain, and grow strategy. Vele has also written a book, The Perpetual Innovation Machine, which describes a holistic approach to management based on ambitious goal setting, data driven analysis, skillful prioritization, inspiring leadership, and the lost art of employee engagement.
Please join the conversation! We love thoughtful communication and are interested in what you think.
All comments are moderated and will be visible once approved. Please only use your real name, not your business name or keywords. Advertisements for your products or services will not be approved.
The Technology Services Industry Association (TSIA) is dedicated to helping services organizations large and small grow and advance in the technology industry. Find out how you can achieve success, too. Call us at (858) 674-5491 or we can call you.